Anti-Trump Student Run Over While Blocking Traffic, Now She’s Suing Her Liberal College

When a liberal college snowflake decided to block traffic while protesting President Donald Trump, she was subsequently run over in a brutal dose of karma. Unbelievably, she’s now suing her own liberal college for an outrageous reason — and it couldn’t be more satisfying.

After UC San Diego student Mariana Flores (right) was run over while blocking traffic during an anti-Trump protest, she decided to sue her own liberal college. (Photo Credit: Screenshot/YouTube, Screenshot/YouTube)

Shortly after Donald Trump’s election in November 2016, a group of ultra-sensitive liberal students of the University of California-San Diego decided the best and brightest way to combat their Democratic loss would be to head out to Interstate-5 in the dead of night and block traffic with their gender-neutral bodies. Expectedly, they quickly discovered that it takes much more than 150 pounds of fascist flesh to stop a speeding car.

On November 9 at 1:40 a.m., 19-year-old sophomore and anti-Trump activist Mariana Flores put her limited knowledge of physics to the test, stepping out in front of traffic. Demonstrating a spectacular display of Darwinism, Flores was subsequently hit by a speeding vehicle, crushing her pelvis, fracturing her leg, and causing her several other avoidable injuries. However, instead of suing the driver who plowed through her, as most hard-headed leftists would, Flores has filed a lawsuit against her own left-leaning college campus for the most perfectly karmic reason.

Showcasing the fact that liberal colleges have created a monster they can no longer control, Flores and her lawyer, Gene Sullivan, are suing UC San Diego for failing to stop her from protesting against Trump in the freeway. In an appropriately absurd dose of liberal logic, Sullivan alleges that the college knew about, planned, and even organized the “protest” in the freeway and that their knowledge of such an inane and dangerous demonstration suggests that the school supported such behavior, according to The College Fix.

“According to Sullivan, not doing anything and failing to act is legally the same thing as supporting the protest,” the newspaper reported. “Sullivan further alleged that the protest was encouraged by people in positions of authority at the university, and that ‘if anyone that is in authority with the university – a [Residential Advisor] – says ‘let’s go,’ the university would be responsible.”

Along with UCSD and the driver involved in the accident, the lawsuit lists the University of California Regents, the city and county of San Diego, and the entire state of California as holding legal responsibility for Flores’ hair-brained decision to run out into traffic.

When asked about the lawsuit by the Los Angeles Times, Sullivan said, “We think it’s a case of shared responsibility of the school, Maria, and the driver, and we’re not saying that anybody is without fault or fault-free. We think other people bear some responsibility as well.”

The frivolous lawsuit comes to a head when Sullivan alleges that if anyone encouraged students to protest Trump, they would be accountable for the demonstrators’ choice to stand in the middle of the interstate at night with nothing more than handheld lights.

Of course, Sullivan isn’t stupid. While he’s certainly making absurd claims, he knows that all it takes for Flores to get some compensation out of her own negligent and criminal behavior is for a panel of easily-swayed jurors to decide that even a fraction of the responsibility is on any of the aforementioned defendants. If Sullivan can convince a California jury, in the event his case makes it to trial, he’ll ensure that he and Flores receive a nice payday.

Still, anyone who can wade through the utter nonsense of such a lawsuit knows that the responsibility in its entirety lies with Flores. According to the Los Angeles Times, the protest started on the UCSD campus before the liberal students decided to move it the freeway, where Flores was hit.

However, there’s an upside to this whole fiasco. The case proves several problems with the liberal agenda. First, it shows just how dangerous this movement is, especially on college campuses. Second, the lawsuit suggests that liberals are simply unable to control their emotions, making them a danger to themselves and society.

Third, the case suggests that the campus has created a dangerous political atmosphere and encourages students to partake in lawless and reckless behavior. Lastly, Sullivan’s claim that the campus should have stopped this demonstration is proof that liberal colleges should no longer reward or allow these types of anti-free speech and violent demonstrations.

Laughably, Sullivan and Flores have placed the liberal college in a catch-22 — if they allow liberal students to hold violent protests, they are responsible for the damage that ensues. If they prohibit liberal students from holding violent protests, they will be accused of suppressing their rights. The college can’t win, and that’s not necessarily a bad thing.

College campuses across the U.S. have empowered a liberal monster that has turned on its creator in the most karmic way possible. Instead of teaching students to think critically and respect constitutional freedoms, they’ve taught them to throw fits, unleash their emotions, and resort to physical violence or legal action, whichever gets the job done. Now, their liberal indoctrination has come back to bite them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *